![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Mixed use building
1845-7 W Grand Ave. Chicago 2002-2003 ![]() Client and Site The client is a landscaper whose desire is to live next to a garden with a view of the city. The property is a 48 feet x 95 feet lot on Grand Avenue, an industrial area 1.5 miles northwest from Chicago's Loop.
|
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Program The zoning ordinance requires commercial spaces to be at the ground level, while the rest of the building can be other uses. Condominiums are currently the most feasible use in Chicago. The building will have two commercial units at the front of the ground floor, five parking spots at the back of the ground floor, two condominiums on the second floor, two condominium units on the third floor, and the clients condominiums with garden on fourth and fifth floor. |
![]() |
Construction System Structure and exterior walls will be precast concrete. Red granulate will be added to the white concrete to achieve a flesh like color. Precast concrete panels will be laid horizontally in order to support its cantilevered corners making use of concrete's easily achieved strength. End panels will interlock with the cantilevered panels, like lincoln logs, and will be fastened to them with steel pins. |
![]() |
Sustainability The roof garden will be used for energy conservation. It will reduce storm water flooding and will clean the air. Sq. Ft. Total enclosed area is 12,500 Sq. Ft., garden area is 3000 Sq. Ft. |
||
design process | |||||||
![]() ground floor/first floor 2 commercial units, parking for condominiums, open-air corridor |
![]() |
![]() second floor 2 condominiums, ivy garden, open-air corridor |
![]() |
![]() third floor 2 condominiums, open-air corridor, secondary access and fire exit for client's residence |
Click to view samples of construction drawings: title sheet - 000 1st + 2nd floor plans - 100 top floor plan + roof plan - 102 long sections - 205 long sections - 206 long sections - 207 short sections - 208 exterior details - 300 exterior details - 301 exterior details - 302 interior elevations - 401 door schedule + details - 600 room finish schedule - 602 |
![]() |
![]() fourth floor study room in client's condominium, mezzanine room at third floor condominium |
![]() |
![]() fifth floor clients condominium, client's garden |
Architectural and Painterly References of Commonality and Togetherness In the spaces portrayed here, two people might have a sense of sudden awareness of a special comradeship with, and humanity of, the other person. |
||||||||
Victor Horta's Carpenter House In this veranda on the corner we can imagine a magnetic force pulling one person towards another. This magnetic force around the veranda has its vortex at this corner. The power of this vortex feels so strong that one can easily imagine two strangers embrace. |
Paul Cezanne's Six Women Women in this painting look lost in their togetherness. We are not interested in this high degree of togetherness in our project. |
Eileen Gray's E.1027 Imagine two people in the space of the terrace: there is a sense that they will accept each other without any judgment. It feels like one could accept a criminal as a fellow human in this space. |
Victor Horta's Max Hallet House Imagine a person at the balcony of this building and yourself at the street. Do you feel that you are somehow connected and together with this person? This is the degree of togetherness that we are seeking in our building on Grand Avenue. |
|||||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
American Community and Commonality How are condominium spaces to relate to each other and to the commercial spaces? This building explores the concept of community, commonality, the problem of forced intimacy, and problems of assumed common ground. This project is an attempt to redefine the idea of the urban residential building by looking afresh at the American dream of community. A feeling of togetherness can be sought through an effort to uniform and harmonize the lifestyles and aspirations of different inhabitants, or it can be sought through constructing a building that makes people |
feel glad to be close to other people regardless of their character, aspirations, or lifestyle. The later is our central search in this project. In our search we are not interested to impose anything on anyone in order to increase commonality but instead to realize an already given commonality. We are not interested in inducing a feeling of equality with others but instead to induce a thrill or a gladness of being together with others. An undeniable humanity of another person is what we have in common. |
We are interested in togetherness achieved by shared space rather than an activity. We aim to provoke a feeling of togetherness without expectations and togetherness without contact, or only with some kind of abstract contact, or not (yet) defined contact. This project aims to remove imposed intimacy from the concept of community. This photo of Horta's Max Hallet House shows us the difference between imposed and induced intimacy by the space. |
|||||
. |
.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Credits: Design: Zoka Zola, Tanja Reiche, Jeff Parfitt, Anna Puijaner, WilliamEmick, Saumya Ganguli - Models: Trevor Lord |